I
had heard the name Joe Paterno, but frequently confused it Rick Pitino, the college
basketball coach. I had never even seen him before the Sandusky Scandal.
My introduction
JoePa's philosophy came by way of an article in
the Wall Street Journal. In 2007, almost 24 players stormed an apartment with
the intent of beating the living daylights out of its occupants. Six were
eventually charged.
If
you break into an apartment with the purpose of seriously injuring the people
who are there,
and
you get caught,
doesn't
integrity say you accept and suffer the consequences of your actions?
Yet
JoePa preferred to have the team spend two hours picking up trash after a game.
It seems he did not want the players to be held legally accountable; he certainly didn't want them to miss any
game time.
I
was confused. What integrity were they crowing about when people spoke of Joe
Paterno? Because if his definition of integrity did not include being responsible
for the consquences for your actions, then what definition was he using?
Based
on the Freeh report, Paterno knew what Sandusky did. With this being my only
exposure to his philosophy, I was not surprised.
Nonetheless,
his statue should stay.
His
legacy is now an example of the chasm between what we seek to be and what we
are. Let his statue remind us to continue striving to shrink that gap.
No comments:
Post a Comment